跳到正文
Simon Willison·· 4 小时前AI 评分54

Claude Code 团队如何做代码评审:评审从终点关口变为持续运行

Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

AI 导读

Simon Willison 引用 Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 关于 Claude Code 团队代码评审的文章。

正文 · 原文

16th October 2026

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"

Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.

Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.

— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review

来源:Simon Willison · simonwillison.net